The Art of Gracious Feedback
+ An In-Depth Downloadable Guide!
Last week’s newsletter identified how not to give feedback—those vague, cutting critiques that leave writers questioning their very existence in academia. You can read that here:
Today, I want to flip the script and explore what feedback can be at its best: a tool for genuine growth and collaboration.
Rethinking Our Approach
The truth is, most of us learned to give feedback through osmosis. We absorbed the models we encountered as graduate students, journal reviewers, and colleagues. Sometimes those models were excellent. Often, they weren't. And because critique feels so central to academic culture, we rarely pause to examine whether we're actually doing it well.
But here's what I've come to believe: the goal of feedback should always be to help the work improve, not to prove our own expertise.
This shift in mindset changes everything. Instead of approaching a manuscript like a detective hunting for flaws, we become collaborators invested in helping ideas reach their full potential. Instead of wielding critique as a weapon, we use it as a tool for collective growth.
What Good Feedback Actually Looks Like
When feedback works well, it's specific rather than vague. It acknowledges strengths before diving into areas for improvement. It asks curious questions instead of issuing declarations. And it assumes that the writer is doing their best work and simply needs to gain perspective to improve.
Good feedback also recognizes that receiving critique is vulnerable work. When someone shares their research, their ideas, their carefully crafted arguments, they're putting part of themselves on the line. The least we can do is honor that vulnerability with thoughtful, constructive responses.
The Ripple Effect
When we give feedback graciously, something remarkable happens. We don't just improve individual pieces of work; instead, we transform the entire culture around critique. We model what collaborative scholarship can look like. We show emerging scholars that feedback doesn't have to be a hazing ritual or a power play.
Imagine if every review process, every workshop critique, and every collegial conversation about someone's work was approached with genuine care for improvement. Imagine if we all saw feedback as an act of intellectual generosity rather than academic gatekeeping.
Beyond Good Intentions
Of course, wanting to give better feedback and actually doing it are two different things. It requires specific techniques, concrete strategies, and sometimes even scripts to help us communicate more effectively. It means knowing how to balance honesty with kindness, how to be specific without being overwhelming, and how to maintain an encouraging tone while still addressing serious concerns.
That's why I've created a comprehensive guide that takes these philosophical principles and translates them into practical action. Whether you're reviewing journal articles, providing feedback on student work, or offering input on a colleague's research, this guide will help you deliver critique that truly serves the work—and the person who created it.
This Month’s Downloadable Guide
Ready to transform how you give feedback? The Guide to Giving Gracious Feedback is available for paid subscribers—you can download it below the paywall and start making critique a tool for growth rather than gatekeeping.
There’s already enough scarcity and competition in academia. The least we can do is make the process of improving our work a little more humane.
Not a paid subscriber yet? Click the button below to upgrade your subscription and get monthly in-depth guides, quarterly webinars, and much more!
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Publish Not Perish to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.