The real reason your writing projects always take longer than planned

Why traditional project planning often falls short for academic writing

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Paid subscribers: Be sure to check out the Academic Writing Time Estimation Guide, which is attached at the bottom! It's this month's writing resource for paid subscribers.

---

When my publisher first offered me a book contract, one of the questions in the advance paperwork felt deceptively simple: "When will you deliver the manuscript?" I remember sitting at my kitchen table with a cup of coffee, pulling out a legal pad to do the math. I had written most of the chapters as articles already, so this felt manageable—I'd estimate how much revision each chapter needed, add some time for transitions and conclusion writing, and maybe throw in a buffer for good measure. One year felt reasonable, maybe even generous.

I ended up delivering the manuscript about nine months after my original deadline, which, as it turns out, is a relatively short delay in aca-writing-land.

My timeline exploded in ways I couldn't have predicted when I was sitting there with my careful calculations. My argument shifted dramatically as I worked with the evidence in front of me; the way of thinking and reasoning becomes clearer over time when you're deep in the material. My book continued to use the majority of the same research, but the significant shift in argument made it feel like a completely different book.

This wasn't procrastination or poor planning; it was the inevitable result of actually doing the intellectual work. I ended up scrapping an entire chapter, writing an entirely new one, and substantially revising every other chapter to align with this new direction. The literature review that seemed sufficient suddenly had gaps the size of canyons when viewed through this new lens.

I felt ashamed that I wasn't meeting my deadline and genuinely worried that my publisher was silently disappointed in my inability to deliver on time. After all, I'm someone who usually meets deadlines. This felt like a personal failure rather than a systemic challenge.

What I didn't realize then, but understand now, is that underestimating how long writing projects will take is an oh-so-common challenge for academics. And while yes, better project management and time management skills are an asset, intellectual labor doesn't follow the same predictable patterns as other types of projects.

You're Not Bad at This—Time Estimation Is Universally Challenging for Academics

As a writing coach, one of the biggest project and time management issues my clients have is estimating how long projects will take them. Nearly every academic writer I work with struggles with this, from PhD students working on dissertations to senior faculty managing book projects. The pattern is remarkably consistent: we create what feels like a reasonable timeline, then watch helplessly as our projects stretch far beyond our original estimates.

This isn't because we're bad at math or chronically optimistic—it's because academic work contains unique challenges that make traditional project planning more challenging. Think about what happens when you're writing and discover that your central argument doesn't quite hold up to scrutiny, or when you realize that an entire body of literature you hadn't considered actually speaks directly to your research question.

Or, imagine you're running an experiment expecting to confirm your hypothesis, but when you analyze the data, you discover the results are the complete opposite of what you predicted—or worse, they're so unexpected that they call your entire theoretical framework into question. Suddenly your discussion section, your literature review, and potentially your entire theoretical framework need to be reconsidered. This isn't a small delay—it's a fundamental pivot that can add months to a project timeline.

The Difference Between Predictable and Unpredictable Academic Work

The challenge runs deeper than individual psychology, but it's not that academic work is universally unpredictable. Rather, academic projects contain a mix of estimable and difficult-to-estimate tasks, and we often struggle to distinguish between them. Academic work is fundamentally different from other types of projects because certain aspects of doing the work change the work itself, while other aspects follow quite predictable patterns.

When a carpenter builds a deck, the measurements don't shift midway through construction because they've had new insights about the nature of wood. But when we write, the act of articulating our ideas during exploratory phases often reveals flaws in our logic, gaps in our evidence, or connections we hadn't previously considered.

Photo by Per Lööv on Unsplash

Despite this unpredictability, once you have a solid outline and know what argument you're making, drafting 500 words from that outline is surprisingly consistent. Most writers can track this over time and become quite accurate at predicting how long it will take. Thus, understanding the distinction between unpredictable and exploratory phases of writing and more predictable phases of writing is critical.

In my work with academic writers, I've noticed that the most significant delays don't come from poor time management skills—they come from the natural process of discovery during exploratory phases, when new ideas and connections arise during literature review and initial drafting that require substantial revisions to existing work. But I've also observed that writers who tracked their productivity during more structured phases (like drafting from detailed outlines or doing final copyediting) became remarkably accurate at estimating those tasks.

The problem is that we often lump all writing tasks together when creating timelines. We estimate "finishing Chapter 3" as if developing the argument, researching additional sources, drafting from an outline, and revising for clarity all take the same kind of unpredictable time. In reality, some of these tasks are highly estimable once you know your own patterns, while others genuinely require the kind of systematic buffers that account for intellectual discovery.

Why the Delays Feel Like Personal Failures

Instead of beating yourself up for your inability to accurately plan your work, focus on developing buffers for unpredictable work and recording how long more estimable tasks take while accepting uncertainty as an inherent feature of intellectual labor. Even highly productive scholars regularly experience periods when the work takes longer than expected, not because of procrastination, but because of genuine intellectual breakthroughs that require substantial revisions.

The guilt and shame that accompany these timeline explosions are so common in academic writers. We internalize the delays as personal failings rather than recognizing them as evidence that we're doing the work properly. We expect our writing to follow predictable patterns when the very nature of good scholarship requires us to remain open to having our minds changed by the evidence.

What I've learned since those early days of missed deadlines is that book editors, dissertation advisors, and journal editors are remarkably accustomed to academic authors delivering late. This isn't because academics are inherently undisciplined; rather, it's because anyone who has worked with scholarly writing understands that the timeline depends on variables that can't be fully predicted at the outset. The shame I felt about being late was largely self-imposed, based on expectations that didn't align with the reality of how intellectual work actually unfolds.

Moving Forward with Better Strategies

The problem isn't that academics are bad at estimating how long things will take. The problem is that we're trying to apply estimation strategies designed for predictable work to inherently unpredictable intellectual labor. Understanding why academic time estimation is so challenging doesn't make deadlines disappear, but it does offer a different framework for thinking about project planning. Once you understand the distinction, you can release your guilt and develop a more realistic approach to estimating how long a project will take.

A Bonus for Paid Subscribers

I’ve put together a bonus handout just for paid subscribers—a practical guide to estimating how long writing projects really take. If you’ve ever built a timeline that immediately collapsed, this guide is for you!